chrX-129561251-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000276.4(OCRL):​c.897G>A​(p.Met299Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,205,463 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. There are 571 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 5 hom., 128 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 29 hom. 443 hem. )

Consequence

OCRL
NM_000276.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00900

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OCRL (HGNC:8108): (OCRL inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase) This gene encodes an inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase. This protein is involved in regulating membrane trafficking and is located in numerous subcellular locations including the trans-Golgi network, clathrin-coated vesicles and, endosomes and the plasma membrane. This protein may also play a role in primary cilium formation. Mutations in this gene cause oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe and also Dent disease. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
OCRL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Dent disease type 2
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • oculocerebrorenal syndrome
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0028491616).
BP6
Variant X-129561251-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-129561251-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129851.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00297 (333/111997) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0298 (315/10567). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0271. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 128 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OCRLNM_000276.4 linkc.897G>A p.Met299Ile missense_variant Exon 10 of 24 ENST00000371113.9 NP_000267.2 Q01968-1
OCRLNM_001318784.2 linkc.900G>A p.Met300Ile missense_variant Exon 10 of 24 NP_001305713.1 Q504W7
OCRLNM_001587.4 linkc.897G>A p.Met299Ile missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 NP_001578.2 Q01968-2A0A2X0TVZ9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OCRLENST00000371113.9 linkc.897G>A p.Met299Ile missense_variant Exon 10 of 24 1 NM_000276.4 ENSP00000360154.4 Q01968-1
OCRLENST00000357121.5 linkc.897G>A p.Met299Ile missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 ENSP00000349635.5 Q01968-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00297
AC:
333
AN:
111942
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000519
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0298
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00770
AC:
1413
AN:
183404
AF XY:
0.00538
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000152
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0505
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000244
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00574
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00149
AC:
1630
AN:
1093466
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00123
AC XY:
443
AN XY:
359116
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000190
AC:
5
AN:
26309
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0445
AC:
1567
AN:
35193
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19345
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30157
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
54020
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40526
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4121
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000143
AC:
12
AN:
837861
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00100
AC:
46
AN:
45934
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
89
178
268
357
446
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00297
AC:
333
AN:
111997
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00374
AC XY:
128
AN XY:
34213
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000518
AC:
16
AN:
30893
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0298
AC:
315
AN:
10567
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2652
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3585
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2693
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6052
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
219
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000188
AC:
1
AN:
53127
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000655
AC:
1
AN:
1527
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
17
25
34
42
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000379
Hom.:
17
Bravo
AF:
0.00548
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000261
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00544
AC:
660
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Sep 08, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 17, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Lowe syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis Benign:1
Mar 24, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

OCRL-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 29, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.57
D;.
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.20
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0028
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.73
N;N
PhyloP100
-0.0090
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
0.057
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.047
D;D
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.15
MutPred
0.41
Loss of disorder (P = 0.0745);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0745);
MVP
0.67
MPC
1.3
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
3.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.20
gMVP
0.61
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138260625; hg19: chrX-128695228; API