chrX-13758462-T-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_003611.3(OFD1):c.1654+14T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000266 in 998,817 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 66 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., 44 hem., cov: 22)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. 22 hem. )

Consequence

OFD1
NM_003611.3 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.59

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OFD1 (HGNC:2567): (OFD1 centriole and centriolar satellite protein) This gene is located on the X chromosome and encodes a centrosomal protein. A knockout mouse model has been used to study the effect of mutations in this gene. The mouse gene is also located on the X chromosome, however, unlike the human gene it is not subject to X inactivation. Mutations in this gene are associated with oral-facial-digital syndrome type I and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2. Many pseudogenes have been identified; a single pseudogene is found on chromosome 5 while as many as fifteen have been found on the Y chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

OFD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ciliopathy
Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Joubert syndrome 10
Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
orofaciodigital syndrome I
Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
retinitis pigmentosa 23
Inheritance: XL Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
retinitis pigmentosa
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2
Inheritance: XL Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P

OFD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).

BP6

Variant X-13758462-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-13758462-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259096.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0013 (146/111920) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00445 (137/30813). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00384. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 44 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 44 XL,AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OFD1	NM_003611.3 link	c.1654+14T>A		intron_variant	Intron 15 of 22	ENST00000340096.11	NP_003602.1	O75665-1E9KL37

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OFD1	ENST00000340096.11 link	c.1654+14T>A		intron_variant	Intron 15 of 22	1	NM_003611.3	ENSP00000344314.6		O75665-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00121

AC:

135

AN:

111869

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00410

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000380

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00332

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000374

AC:

AN:

176534

AF XY:

0.000209

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00440

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000229

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000135

AC:

120

AN:

886897

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000947

AC XY:

AN XY:

232367

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

22295

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000377

AC:

AN:

34481

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

18022

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

29274

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000205

AC:

AN:

48721

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

40319

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2636

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000153

AC:

AN:

652053

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000384

AC:

AN:

39096

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00130

AC:

146

AN:

111920

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00129

AC XY:

AN XY:

34086

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00445

AC:

137

AN:

30813

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000380

AC:

AN:

10537

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2646

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3579

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2711

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5963

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

216

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53243

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00328

AC:

AN:

1525

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00114

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00143

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Joubert syndrome;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I

Benign:1

Jan 24, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 23;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I;C1846175:Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2;C2749019:Joubert syndrome 10

Benign:1

Aug 12, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

3.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

1.6

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over