chrX-13767190-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_003611.3(OFD1):​c.2663A>C​(p.Lys888Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000758 in 1,209,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. There are 223 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 3 hom., 92 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00047 ( 2 hom. 131 hem. )

Consequence

OFD1
NM_003611.3 missense

Scores

4
12

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.361

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OFD1 (HGNC:2567): (OFD1 centriole and centriolar satellite protein) This gene is located on the X chromosome and encodes a centrosomal protein. A knockout mouse model has been used to study the effect of mutations in this gene. The mouse gene is also located on the X chromosome, however, unlike the human gene it is not subject to X inactivation. Mutations in this gene are associated with oral-facial-digital syndrome type I and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2. Many pseudogenes have been identified; a single pseudogene is found on chromosome 5 while as many as fifteen have been found on the Y chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
OFD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 10
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • orofaciodigital syndrome I
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa 23
    Inheritance: XL Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: XL Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00684464).
BP6
Variant X-13767190-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-13767190-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 159472.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00354 (398/112373) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0112 (346/30925). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0102. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 92 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 XL,AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OFD1NM_003611.3 linkc.2663A>C p.Lys888Thr missense_variant Exon 20 of 23 ENST00000340096.11 NP_003602.1 O75665-1E9KL37

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OFD1ENST00000340096.11 linkc.2663A>C p.Lys888Thr missense_variant Exon 20 of 23 1 NM_003611.3 ENSP00000344314.6 O75665-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00356
AC:
400
AN:
112320
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00728
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
212
AN:
183277
AF XY:
0.000723
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000135
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000884
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000473
AC:
519
AN:
1096715
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000362
AC XY:
131
AN XY:
362099
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0124
AC:
326
AN:
26360
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
55
AN:
35201
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19374
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30199
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000370
AC:
2
AN:
54110
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40529
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
5
AN:
4129
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000952
AC:
80
AN:
840768
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
51
AN:
46045
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
70
93
116
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00354
AC:
398
AN:
112373
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00266
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
34541
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
346
AN:
30925
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00318
AC:
34
AN:
10706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2646
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3577
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2677
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6168
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00457
AC:
1
AN:
219
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000113
AC:
6
AN:
53236
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00719
AC:
11
AN:
1529
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
47
63
79
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00151
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00489
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0133
AC:
51
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00115
AC:
140
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jul 27, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
May 01, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I Benign:1
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Jan 10, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 23;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I;C1846175:Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2;C2749019:Joubert syndrome 10 Benign:1
Sep 27, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.099
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;.;.
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.070
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.65
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0068
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.;.
PhyloP100
-0.36
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;D;N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Uncertain
0.018
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.090
T;D;T
Polyphen
0.037
B;B;B
Vest4
0.22
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.40
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
-1.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.084
gMVP
0.080
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149647255; hg19: chrX-13785309; API