chrX-152740352-C-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The ENST00000361201.8(CSAG4):n.332C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 22)
Consequence
CSAG4
ENST00000361201.8 non_coding_transcript_exon
ENST00000361201.8 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.656
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant X-152740352-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-152740352-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 1206311.Status of the report is no_assertion_criteria_provided, 0 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSAG4 | NR_073432.1 | n.332C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 3 of 4 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 22
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
22
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 22
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
22
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at