chrX-154371181-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):āc.65A>Gā(p.Asp22Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000812 in 1,194,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 26 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110556.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000303 AC: 34AN: 112360Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000318 AC XY: 11AN XY: 34570
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000343 AC: 5AN: 145796Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000216 AC XY: 1AN XY: 46318
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000582 AC: 63AN: 1081752Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000425 AC XY: 15AN XY: 352676
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000302 AC: 34AN: 112410Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000318 AC XY: 11AN XY: 34632
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
BP4, PP2 -
- -
- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at