chrX-154379677-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000117.3(EMD):​c.83-13C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000555 in 1,205,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. There are 180 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., 83 hem., cov: 25)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 2 hom. 97 hem. )

Consequence

EMD
NM_000117.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.467
Variant links:
Genes affected
EMD (HGNC:3331): (emerin) Emerin is a serine-rich nuclear membrane protein and a member of the nuclear lamina-associated protein family. It mediates membrane anchorage to the cytoskeleton. Dreifuss-Emery muscular dystrophy is an X-linked inherited degenerative myopathy resulting from mutation in the emerin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant X-154379677-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154379677-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42279.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-154379677-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00282 (318/112686) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00969 (302/31155). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00879. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 83 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 25. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 83 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EMDNM_000117.3 linkc.83-13C>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 5 ENST00000369842.9 NP_000108.1 P50402

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EMDENST00000369842.9 linkc.83-13C>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 5 1 NM_000117.3 ENSP00000358857.4 P50402

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00281
AC:
316
AN:
112638
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
0.00236
AC XY:
82
AN XY:
34800
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000927
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000377
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000755
AC:
129
AN:
170813
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000428
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
63147
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00999
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000482
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000107
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000135
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000473
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000321
AC:
351
AN:
1093166
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000270
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
359708
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000484
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000332
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000926
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000596
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00107
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00282
AC:
318
AN:
112686
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
0.00238
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
34858
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00969
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000925
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000377
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000655
Alfa
AF:
0.000174
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

c.83-13C>G in intron 1 of EMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1% (63/5981) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201140396). -

Jan 13, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: EMD c.83-13C>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.001 in 192415 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.01 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.41 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in EMD causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0071), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.83-13C>G has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). This report however, does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. One ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 1, X-linked Benign:1
May 15, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
6.5
DANN
Benign
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201140396; hg19: chrX-153608037; API