chrX-154776813-CAAG-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP3BP6BS2

The NM_001363.5(DKC1):​c.1512_1514delGAA​(p.Lys505del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00286 in 1,059,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 353 hemizygotes in GnomAD. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00096 ( 0 hom., 32 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 0 hom. 321 hem. )

Consequence

DKC1
NM_001363.5 disruptive_inframe_deletion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.30

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DKC1 (HGNC:2890): (dyskerin pseudouridine synthase 1) This gene functions in two distinct complexes. It plays an active role in telomerase stabilization and maintenance, as well as recognition of snoRNAs containing H/ACA sequences which provides stability during biogenesis and assembly into H/ACA small nucleolar RNA ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs). This gene is highly conserved and widely expressed, and may play additional roles in nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling, DNA damage response, and cell adhesion. Mutations have been associated with X-linked dyskeratosis congenita. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
DKC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • DKC1-related disorder
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dyskeratosis congenita, X-linked
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • dyskeratosis congenita
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP3
Nonframeshift variant in repetitive region in NM_001363.5
BP6
Variant X-154776813-CAAG-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154776813-CAAG-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 238951.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 105 XL,AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DKC1NM_001363.5 linkc.1512_1514delGAA p.Lys505del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 15 of 15 ENST00000369550.10 NP_001354.1 O60832-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DKC1ENST00000369550.10 linkc.1512_1514delGAA p.Lys505del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 15 of 15 1 NM_001363.5 ENSP00000358563.5 O60832-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000958
AC:
105
AN:
109632
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00686
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000177
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00274
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00425
AC:
545
AN:
128377
AF XY:
0.00116
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00595
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00303
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00398
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00776
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00308
AC:
2930
AN:
950193
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00104
AC XY:
321
AN XY:
308425
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00292
AC:
66
AN:
22584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00466
AC:
134
AN:
28752
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0148
AC:
242
AN:
16324
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00229
AC:
57
AN:
24869
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000960
AC:
39
AN:
40632
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00326
AC:
113
AN:
34629
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
7
AN:
3682
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00287
AC:
2124
AN:
739571
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
148
AN:
39150
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.318
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
304
608
912
1216
1520
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
78
156
234
312
390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000957
AC:
105
AN:
109677
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.000989
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
32367
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000264
AC:
8
AN:
30265
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00174
AC:
18
AN:
10346
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00686
AC:
18
AN:
2625
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3537
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2467
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000177
AC:
1
AN:
5638
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
214
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
56
AN:
52431
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00271
AC:
4
AN:
1476
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0476
Hom.:
6

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jun 16, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 24, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 03, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:3
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 24, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 16, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

DKC1-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Dyskeratosis congenita, X-linked Benign:1
Jan 23, 2019
Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
4.3
Mutation Taster
=76/24
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs782576893; hg19: chrX-154005088; COSMIC: COSV65729228; COSMIC: COSV65729228; API