chrX-25004688-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_139058.3(ARX):c.1671G>A(p.Thr557=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00406 in 1,164,057 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. There are 1,540 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_139058.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARX | NM_139058.3 | c.1671G>A | p.Thr557= | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000379044.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARX | ENST00000379044.5 | c.1671G>A | p.Thr557= | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_139058.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00332 AC: 376AN: 113263Hom.: 1 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00356 AC XY: 126AN XY: 35419
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00299 AC: 314AN: 105177Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00280 AC XY: 103AN XY: 36819
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00414 AC: 4345AN: 1050748Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00412 AC XY: 1414AN XY: 343046
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00332 AC: 376AN: 113309Hom.: 1 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00355 AC XY: 126AN XY: 35475
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 07, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Intellectual disability, X-linked, with or without seizures, arx-related;C3463992:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 22, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at