chrX-25004688-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000379044.5(ARX):c.1671G>A(p.Thr557=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00406 in 1,164,057 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. There are 1,540 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000379044.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARX | NM_139058.3 | c.1671G>A | p.Thr557= | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000379044.5 | NP_620689.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARX | ENST00000379044.5 | c.1671G>A | p.Thr557= | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_139058.3 | ENSP00000368332 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00332 AC: 376AN: 113263Hom.: 1 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00356 AC XY: 126AN XY: 35419
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00299 AC: 314AN: 105177Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00280 AC XY: 103AN XY: 36819
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00414 AC: 4345AN: 1050748Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00412 AC XY: 1414AN XY: 343046
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00332 AC: 376AN: 113309Hom.: 1 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00355 AC XY: 126AN XY: 35475
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 07, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Intellectual disability, X-linked, with or without seizures, arx-related;C3463992:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 22, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at