chrX-38297331-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001034853.2(RPGR):āc.1367A>Gā(p.Gln456Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.012 in 1,208,127 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73 homozygotes. There are 4,533 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001034853.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGR | NM_001034853.2 | c.1367A>G | p.Gln456Arg | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000645032.1 | NP_001030025.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGR | ENST00000645032.1 | c.1367A>G | p.Gln456Arg | missense_variant | 11/15 | NM_001034853.2 | ENSP00000495537 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00788 AC: 869AN: 110303Hom.: 2 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00689 AC XY: 224AN XY: 32513
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00831 AC: 1524AN: 183345Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00796 AC XY: 540AN XY: 67837
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0124 AC: 13585AN: 1097770Hom.: 71 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0119 AC XY: 4309AN XY: 363160
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00787 AC: 869AN: 110357Hom.: 2 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00688 AC XY: 224AN XY: 32577
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 30, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 12, 2022 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 13, 2015 | p.Gln456Arg in exon 11 of RPGR: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 1.1% (71/6728) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs144635565). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 30, 2013 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 27, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at