chrX-41727704-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_080817.5(GPR82):c.678C>A(p.Ser226Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000284 in 1,196,788 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 100 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080817.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPR82 | NM_080817.5 | c.678C>A | p.Ser226Arg | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000302548.5 | |
CASK | NM_001367721.1 | c.429+11680G>T | intron_variant | ENST00000378163.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPR82 | ENST00000302548.5 | c.678C>A | p.Ser226Arg | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_080817.5 | P1 | |
CASK | ENST00000378163.7 | c.429+11680G>T | intron_variant | 5 | NM_001367721.1 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000349 AC: 39AN: 111633Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000177 AC XY: 6AN XY: 33861
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00101 AC: 184AN: 182392Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000897 AC XY: 60AN XY: 66914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000278 AC: 302AN: 1085101Hom.: 1 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000268 AC XY: 94AN XY: 351189
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000340 AC: 38AN: 111687Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000177 AC XY: 6AN XY: 33925
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 05, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at