rs10000
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.2466T>C(p.Leu822Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 91 hom., cov: 9)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 2515 hom. )
Consequence
PMS2
NM_000535.7 synonymous
NM_000535.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.920
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 7-5973522-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5973522-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 36690.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5973522-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.92 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.143 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | NM_000535.7 | c.2466T>C | p.Leu822Leu | synonymous_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000265849.12 | NP_000526.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | ENST00000265849.12 | c.2466T>C | p.Leu822Leu | synonymous_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_000535.7 | ENSP00000265849.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.114 AC: 8266AN: 72292Hom.: 89 Cov.: 9
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8266
AN:
72292
Hom.:
Cov.:
9
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.110 AC: 15089AN: 136684Hom.: 518 AF XY: 0.115 AC XY: 8408AN XY: 72926
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
15089
AN:
136684
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8408
AN XY:
72926
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.127 AC: 65729AN: 515862Hom.: 2515 Cov.: 6 AF XY: 0.129 AC XY: 35287AN XY: 273858
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
65729
AN:
515862
Hom.:
Cov.:
6
AF XY:
AC XY:
35287
AN XY:
273858
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.114 AC: 8277AN: 72368Hom.: 91 Cov.: 9 AF XY: 0.115 AC XY: 3829AN XY: 33250
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
8277
AN:
72368
Hom.:
Cov.:
9
AF XY:
AC XY:
3829
AN XY:
33250
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 04, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jul 01, 2016 | Found in patient having exome sequencing due to suspicion for hereditary colon cancer and/or polyps. Patient is a 49 year old male with a family history of colorectal cancer and/or polyps. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | research | International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) | Sep 05, 2013 | MAF >1% - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 18, 2011 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 11, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The c.2466T>C, p.Leu822= variant was identified in 11% of132692 control alleles in the Genome Aggregation Consortium (February 27, 2017). According to ACMG guidelines for variant classification based on allele frequency, category BA1, this variant is considered benign and has not been further reviewed (Richards 2015). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at