rs10033086

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006017.3(PROM1):​c.129C>T​(p.Thr43Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.033 in 1,613,598 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,743 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.084 ( 1237 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.028 ( 1506 hom. )

Consequence

PROM1
NM_006017.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0920

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PROM1 (HGNC:9454): (prominin 1) This gene encodes a pentaspan transmembrane glycoprotein. The protein localizes to membrane protrusions and is often expressed on adult stem cells, where it is thought to function in maintaining stem cell properties by suppressing differentiation. Mutations in this gene have been shown to result in retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease. Expression of this gene is also associated with several types of cancer. This gene is expressed from at least five alternative promoters that are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
PROM1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinal macular dystrophy type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • inherited retinal dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • retinitis pigmentosa 41
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • cone-rod dystrophy 12
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • cone-rod dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Stargardt disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 4-16075778-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-16075778-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259902.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.092 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.231 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PROM1NM_006017.3 linkc.129C>T p.Thr43Thr synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 28 ENST00000447510.7 NP_006008.1 O43490-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PROM1ENST00000447510.7 linkc.129C>T p.Thr43Thr synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 28 1 NM_006017.3 ENSP00000415481.2 O43490-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0843
AC:
12806
AN:
151986
Hom.:
1228
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.235
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0352
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0268
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00976
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0465
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0656
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0354
AC:
8813
AN:
248726
AF XY:
0.0316
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.239
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0287
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0465
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0251
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0260
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0276
AC:
40354
AN:
1461494
Hom.:
1506
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0268
AC XY:
19456
AN XY:
727016
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.248
AC:
8289
AN:
33464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0214
AC:
956
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0293
AC:
766
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00729
AC:
628
AN:
86184
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0449
AC:
2395
AN:
53390
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
243
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0224
AC:
24900
AN:
1111788
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0360
AC:
2175
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2033
4066
6098
8131
10164
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
984
1968
2952
3936
4920
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0845
AC:
12852
AN:
152104
Hom.:
1237
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0834
AC XY:
6199
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.235
AC:
9746
AN:
41446
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0351
AC:
537
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0268
AC:
93
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000387
AC:
2
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00956
AC:
46
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0465
AC:
493
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
12
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0259
AC:
1758
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0649
AC:
137
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
514
1027
1541
2054
2568
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
126
252
378
504
630
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0375
Hom.:
565
Bravo
AF:
0.0890
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0190
AC:
67
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0207
EpiControl
AF:
0.0229

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 02, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Stargardt disease 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Retinal macular dystrophy type 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cone-rod dystrophy 12 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
2.4
DANN
Benign
0.34
PhyloP100
-0.092
PromoterAI
-0.011
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10033086; hg19: chr4-16077401; COSMIC: COSV71699362; COSMIC: COSV71699362; API