rs10036665
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001496.4(GFRA3):c.*508A>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.159 in 154,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,105 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001496.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001496.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFRA3 | NM_001496.4 | MANE Select | c.*508A>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_001487.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFRA3 | ENST00000274721.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*508A>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000274721.3 | |||
| GFRA3 | ENST00000378362.3 | TSL:1 | c.*508A>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000367613.3 | |||
| GFRA3 | ENST00000714690.1 | n.*1459A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000519919.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.159 AC: 24187AN: 152066Hom.: 2085 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.152 AC: 301AN: 1978Hom.: 23 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.146 AC XY: 161AN XY: 1106 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.159 AC: 24194AN: 152184Hom.: 2082 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.158 AC XY: 11772AN XY: 74388 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at