rs1004903

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.13372+9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.205 in 1,611,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38,627 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.29 ( 8010 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 30617 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.752

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
DYNC1H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 14-102048678-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102048678-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128932.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.517 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkc.13372+9G>A intron_variant Intron 74 of 77 ENST00000360184.10 NP_001367.2 Q14204

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkc.13372+9G>A intron_variant Intron 74 of 77 1 NM_001376.5 ENSP00000348965.4 Q14204

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.290
AC:
44009
AN:
151978
Hom.:
7977
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.522
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.237
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.239
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.237
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.212
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.323
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.187
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.296
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.223
AC:
55695
AN:
250266
AF XY:
0.216
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.524
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.249
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.194
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.221
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.196
AC:
286269
AN:
1459750
Hom.:
30617
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.195
AC XY:
141938
AN XY:
726146
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.530
AC:
17704
AN:
33410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.214
AC:
9564
AN:
44630
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.247
AC:
6465
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.233
AC:
9239
AN:
39666
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.204
AC:
17535
AN:
86126
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.200
AC:
10687
AN:
53332
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.258
AC:
1167
AN:
4520
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.180
AC:
200564
AN:
1111712
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.222
AC:
13344
AN:
60230
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14367
28734
43100
57467
71834
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7272
14544
21816
29088
36360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.290
AC:
44089
AN:
152096
Hom.:
8010
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.287
AC XY:
21355
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.522
AC:
21662
AN:
41466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.237
AC:
3621
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.239
AC:
829
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.237
AC:
1221
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.208
AC:
1005
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.212
AC:
2250
AN:
10592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.327
AC:
96
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.187
AC:
12685
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.294
AC:
620
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1450
2900
4350
5800
7250
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
428
856
1284
1712
2140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.233
Hom.:
3651
Bravo
AF:
0.303
Asia WGS
AF:
0.235
AC:
815
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Nov 16, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
May 31, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13 Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
0.75
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1004903; hg19: chr14-102515015; COSMIC: COSV64135230; COSMIC: COSV64135230; API