rs10129889

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.12087C>A​(p.His4029Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0728 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,314 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 1814 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.068 ( 4500 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 missense

Scores

3
14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.457
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), DYNC1H1. . Gene score misZ 10.967 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 16.053 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability, neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13, autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016406178).
BP6
Variant 14-102041719-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102041719-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128928.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102041719-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.266 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.12087C>A p.His4029Gln missense_variant 65/78 ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.12087C>A p.His4029Gln missense_variant 65/781 NM_001376.5 P1
ENST00000553701.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.347-4950G>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.121
AC:
18430
AN:
152120
Hom.:
1815
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.270
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0504
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0649
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0527
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0823
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0667
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.113
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0693
AC:
17413
AN:
251132
Hom.:
1069
AF XY:
0.0640
AC XY:
8692
AN XY:
135766
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.277
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0425
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0429
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000381
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0917
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0688
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0662
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0678
AC:
99066
AN:
1461778
Hom.:
4500
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0658
AC XY:
47814
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.281
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0278
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0932
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0669
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0731
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.121
AC:
18455
AN:
152238
Hom.:
1814
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.118
AC XY:
8790
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.270
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0647
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0527
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.104
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0667
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.112
Alfa
AF:
0.0743
Hom.:
1100
Bravo
AF:
0.126
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0585
AC:
217
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0675
AC:
260
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.272
AC:
1199
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0621
AC:
534
ExAC
AF:
0.0740
AC:
8982
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0220
AC:
77
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0620
EpiControl
AF:
0.0672

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 30, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 16, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 22, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.74
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.89
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.084
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.44
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.20
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.55
N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.00065
P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Benign
0.66
T;.
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.
Vest4
0.17
MutPred
0.26
Gain of helix (P = 0.132);.;
MPC
0.94
ClinPred
0.010
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10129889; hg19: chr14-102508056; COSMIC: COSV64141742; COSMIC: COSV64141742; API