rs10180793

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_201548.5(CERKL):​c.1506C>T​(p.Asp502Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.999 in 1,608,470 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 801,911 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.99 ( 75051 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 ( 726860 hom. )

Consequence

CERKL
NM_201548.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.749

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CERKL (HGNC:21699): (ceramide kinase like) This gene was initially identified as a locus (RP26) associated with an autosomal recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) disease. This gene encodes a protein with ceramide kinase-like domains, however, the protein does not phosphorylate ceramide and its target substrate is currently unknown. This protein may be a negative regulator of apoptosis in photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene cause a form of retinitis pigmentosa characterized by autosomal recessive cone and rod dystrophy (arCRD). Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms and non-coding transcripts.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
ITGA4 (HGNC:6140): (integrin subunit alpha 4) The gene encodes a member of the integrin alpha chain family of proteins. Integrins are heterodimeric integral membrane proteins composed of an alpha chain and a beta chain that function in cell surface adhesion and signaling. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate light and heavy chains that comprise the alpha 4 subunit. This subunit associates with a beta 1 or beta 7 subunit to form an integrin that may play a role in cell motility and migration. This integrin is a therapeutic target for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 2-181539124-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-181539124-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 166844.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.749 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CERKLNM_201548.5 linkc.1506C>T p.Asp502Asp synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 13 ENST00000410087.8 NP_963842.1
ITGA4NM_000885.6 linkc.*3597G>A downstream_gene_variant ENST00000397033.7 NP_000876.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CERKLENST00000410087.8 linkc.1506C>T p.Asp502Asp synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 13 1 NM_201548.5 ENSP00000386725.3
ITGA4ENST00000397033.7 linkc.*3597G>A downstream_gene_variant 1 NM_000885.6 ENSP00000380227.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.993
AC:
151050
AN:
152134
Hom.:
75001
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.976
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.995
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.996
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.995
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.998
AC:
250751
AN:
251272
AF XY:
0.998
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.976
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.998
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.995
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.999
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.999
AC:
1454956
AN:
1456218
Hom.:
726860
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.999
AC XY:
724216
AN XY:
724762
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.976
AC:
32520
AN:
33326
American (AMR)
AF:
0.998
AC:
44638
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.996
AC:
25956
AN:
26072
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
39585
AN:
39586
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
86107
AN:
86126
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
53386
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.998
AC:
5744
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
1106999
AN:
1107066
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.997
AC:
60021
AN:
60186
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.442
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
65
130
196
261
326
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21546
43092
64638
86184
107730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.993
AC:
151159
AN:
152252
Hom.:
75051
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.993
AC XY:
73902
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.976
AC:
40565
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.995
AC:
15196
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.996
AC:
3457
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5187
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
4822
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
10612
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
1.00
AC:
294
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
68013
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.995
AC:
2103
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
56
111
167
222
278
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
914
1828
2742
3656
4570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.997
Hom.:
144230
Bravo
AF:
0.992
Asia WGS
AF:
0.997
AC:
3464
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
1.00
EpiControl
AF:
1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Feb 19, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Retinitis pigmentosa 26 Benign:2
Nov 21, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
5.0
DANN
Benign
0.76
PhyloP100
0.75
Mutation Taster
=79/21
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10180793; hg19: chr2-182403851; COSMIC: COSV108174497; COSMIC: COSV108174497; API