rs10216243
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_199000.3(LHFPL3):c.683-33010C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0876 in 152,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,253 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.088 ( 1253 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
LHFPL3
NM_199000.3 intron
NM_199000.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0130
Publications
1 publications found
Genes affected
LHFPL3 (HGNC:6589): (LHFPL tetraspan subfamily member 3) This gene is a member of the lipoma HMGIC fusion partner (LHFP) gene family, which is a subset of the superfamily of tetraspan transmembrane protein encoding genes. Mutations in one LHFP-like gene result in deafness in humans and mice, and a second LHFP-like gene is fused to a high-mobility group gene in a translocation-associated lipoma. A partial gene fragment named LHFPL4 corresponds to a portion of the first exon of this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.416 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHFPL3 | ENST00000424859.7 | c.683-33010C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 | 1 | NM_199000.3 | ENSP00000393128.2 | |||
| LHFPL3 | ENST00000401970.3 | c.*31+27748C>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | 1 | ENSP00000385374.3 | ||||
| LHFPL3 | ENST00000683240.1 | n.*290-33010C>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | ENSP00000508253.1 | |||||
| LHFPL3 | ENST00000684090.1 | n.261-33010C>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0875 AC: 13312AN: 152120Hom.: 1252 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
13312
AN:
152120
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0876 AC: 13331AN: 152238Hom.: 1253 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0915 AC XY: 6809AN XY: 74420 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13331
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6809
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
7174
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1531
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
48
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2232
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
325
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
439
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1403
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
569
1137
1706
2274
2843
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
140
280
420
560
700
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
899
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.