rs1022208001
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_178570.3(RTN4RL2):c.1091C>A(p.Ala364Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000772 in 1,295,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A364V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178570.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_178570.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTN4RL2 | NM_178570.3 | MANE Select | c.1091C>A | p.Ala364Glu | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_848665.1 | Q86UN3-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTN4RL2 | ENST00000335099.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1091C>A | p.Ala364Glu | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000335397.3 | Q86UN3-1 | |
| ENSG00000255301 | ENST00000528885.1 | TSL:2 | n.539-101G>T | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.72e-7 AC: 1AN: 1295590Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 633992 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at