rs1025558859
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000159.4(GCDH):c.268G>A(p.Glu90Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000159.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | NM_000159.4 | c.268G>A | p.Glu90Lys | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 12 | ENST00000222214.10 | NP_000150.1 | |
GCDH | NM_013976.5 | c.268G>A | p.Glu90Lys | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 12 | NP_039663.1 | ||
GCDH | NR_102316.1 | n.376G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 12 | ||||
GCDH | NR_102317.1 | n.684G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 3 of 11 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251412Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135900
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glutaric aciduria, type 1 Pathogenic:4
Variant summary: GCDH c.268G>A (p.Glu90Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase/oxidase, N-terminal domain (IPR013786) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251412 control chromosomes. c.268G>A has been reported in the literature as a compound heterozygous genotype in at-least one individual affected with Glutaric aciduria, type 1 supported by characteristic biochemical elevations of both glutarate and 3-hydroxyglutarate (example, Busquets_2000). At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in decreased GCDH protein stability in-vitro (example, Schmiesing_2017). One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely pathogenic citing overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation further supported by modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties performed at their laboratory. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
- -
Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 90 of the GCDH protein (p.Glu90Lys). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.008%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (PMID: 10960496). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 459949). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on GCDH function (PMID: 28062662). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at