rs10380

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_002454.3(MTRR):​c.1783C>T​(p.His595Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.12 in 1,613,374 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15,754 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.18 ( 3416 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 12338 hom. )

Consequence

MTRR
NM_002454.3 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.559
Variant links:
Genes affected
MTRR (HGNC:7473): (5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase) This gene encodes a member of the ferredoxin-NADP(+) reductase (FNR) family of electron transferases. This protein functions in the synthesis of methionine by regenerating methionine synthase to a functional state. Because methionine synthesis requires methyl-group transfer by a folate donor, activity of the encoded enzyme is important for folate metabolism and cellular methylation. Mutations in this gene can cause homocystinuria-megaloblastic anemia, cbl E type. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012291789).
BP6
Variant 5-7897078-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-7897078-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138300.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-7897078-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.323 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MTRRNM_002454.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1783C>T p.His595Tyr missense_variant 14/15 ENST00000440940.7 NP_002445.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MTRRENST00000440940.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1783C>T p.His595Tyr missense_variant 14/151 NM_002454.3 ENSP00000402510 P1Q9UBK8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.179
AC:
27185
AN:
152012
Hom.:
3398
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.328
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.272
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.155
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.147
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.136
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.149
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0940
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.169
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.157
AC:
39347
AN:
250918
Hom.:
4573
AF XY:
0.145
AC XY:
19635
AN XY:
135632
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.335
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0699
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0952
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.124
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.113
AC:
165838
AN:
1461244
Hom.:
12338
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.112
AC XY:
81709
AN XY:
726952
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.334
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.341
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.137
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0682
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0951
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.129
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.179
AC:
27246
AN:
152130
Hom.:
3416
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.178
AC XY:
13263
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.328
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.273
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.155
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.147
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0940
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.172
Alfa
AF:
0.117
Hom.:
3322
Bravo
AF:
0.203
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0952
AC:
353
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0911
AC:
351
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.320
AC:
1410
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0978
AC:
841
ExAC
AF:
0.151
AC:
18324
Asia WGS
AF:
0.145
AC:
505
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.100
EpiControl
AF:
0.102

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Methylcobalamin deficiency type cblE Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJun 19, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedcase-controlDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna-- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 29, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.069
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.47
Eigen
Benign
-0.71
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.72
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.079
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.17
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.18
T;T
Vest4
0.065
MPC
0.052
ClinPred
0.0019
T
GERP RS
4.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.065
gMVP
0.39

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10380; hg19: chr5-7897191; COSMIC: COSV52944133; COSMIC: COSV52944133; API