rs1040904

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):​c.287C>A​(p.Pro96Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0489 in 1,612,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,144 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.057 ( 370 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.048 ( 2774 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1
NM_020366.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.480

Publications

17 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
RPGRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cone-rod dystrophy 13
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • cone-rod dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026779473).
BP6
Variant 14-21301034-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21301034-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 99819.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.154 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1NM_020366.4 linkc.287C>A p.Pro96Gln missense_variant Exon 4 of 25 ENST00000400017.7 NP_065099.3 Q96KN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1ENST00000400017.7 linkc.287C>A p.Pro96Gln missense_variant Exon 4 of 25 1 NM_020366.4 ENSP00000382895.2 Q96KN7-1
RPGRIP1ENST00000557771.5 linkc.287C>A p.Pro96Gln missense_variant Exon 3 of 24 5 ENSP00000451219.1 G3V3F7
RPGRIP1ENST00000556336.5 linkc.287C>A p.Pro96Gln missense_variant Exon 3 of 21 5 ENSP00000450445.1 G3V236
RPGRIP1ENST00000554750.1 linkn.-115C>A upstream_gene_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0570
AC:
8677
AN:
152180
Hom.:
363
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0562
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.120
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.158
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0608
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0349
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0339
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0420
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0459
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0709
AC:
17194
AN:
242586
AF XY:
0.0627
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0522
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0581
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0355
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0283
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0419
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0609
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0481
AC:
70169
AN:
1460108
Hom.:
2774
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0468
AC XY:
33975
AN XY:
726328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0531
AC:
1774
AN:
33440
American (AMR)
AF:
0.239
AC:
10665
AN:
44654
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0561
AC:
1462
AN:
26078
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0296
AC:
1173
AN:
39676
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0348
AC:
3001
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
1431
AN:
52656
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0689
AC:
397
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0427
AC:
47453
AN:
1111310
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0466
AC:
2813
AN:
60308
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3951
7901
11852
15802
19753
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1940
3880
5820
7760
9700
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0572
AC:
8706
AN:
152298
Hom.:
370
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0574
AC XY:
4276
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0565
AC:
2347
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.159
AC:
2429
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0608
AC:
211
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0350
AC:
181
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0337
AC:
163
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
289
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0782
AC:
23
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0420
AC:
2858
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0454
AC:
96
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
399
797
1196
1594
1993
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
88
176
264
352
440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0453
Hom.:
277
Bravo
AF:
0.0686
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0472
AC:
175
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0324
AC:
125
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0535
AC:
204
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0390
AC:
317
ExAC
AF:
0.0604
AC:
7254
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0460
AC:
162
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0419
EpiControl
AF:
0.0485

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2Other:1
-
Retina International
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jul 28, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.75
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
2.0
DANN
Benign
0.70
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0023
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0022
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.42
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0027
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.76
.;.;N
PhyloP100
0.48
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
2.0
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.068
Sift
Benign
0.96
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.64
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0070
.;.;B
Vest4
0.088
MPC
0.062
ClinPred
0.00052
T
GERP RS
-0.43
Varity_R
0.025
gMVP
0.068
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1040904; hg19: chr14-21769193; COSMIC: COSV52848453; COSMIC: COSV52848453; API