rs1040904
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):c.287C>A(p.Pro96Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0489 in 1,612,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,144 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020366.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | NM_020366.4 | c.287C>A | p.Pro96Gln | missense_variant | 4/25 | ENST00000400017.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000400017.7 | c.287C>A | p.Pro96Gln | missense_variant | 4/25 | 1 | NM_020366.4 | P2 | |
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000557771.5 | c.287C>A | p.Pro96Gln | missense_variant | 3/24 | 5 | A2 | ||
RPGRIP1 | ENST00000556336.5 | c.287C>A | p.Pro96Gln | missense_variant | 3/21 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0570 AC: 8677AN: 152180Hom.: 363 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0709 AC: 17194AN: 242586Hom.: 1429 AF XY: 0.0627 AC XY: 8334AN XY: 132852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0481 AC: 70169AN: 1460108Hom.: 2774 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0468 AC XY: 33975AN XY: 726328
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0572 AC: 8706AN: 152298Hom.: 370 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0574 AC XY: 4276AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 28, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at