rs1042347

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.*820G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0217 in 233,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 245 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.030 ( 220 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0069 ( 25 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.14

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Denys-Drash syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
  • Wilms tumor 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Frasier syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 11-32388238-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32388238-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304390.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0996 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkc.*820G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 ENST00000452863.10 NP_077744.4 P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkc.*820G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 1 NM_024426.6 ENSP00000415516.5 P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0297
AC:
4516
AN:
152106
Hom.:
220
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.102
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0191
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00693
AC:
564
AN:
81424
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00592
AC XY:
222
AN XY:
37486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0995
AC:
388
AN:
3900
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0128
AC:
32
AN:
2500
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
11394
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
702
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
484
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00813
AC:
4
AN:
492
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000519
AC:
26
AN:
50054
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0168
AC:
114
AN:
6774
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
33
66
98
131
164
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0297
AC:
4514
AN:
152224
Hom.:
220
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0286
AC XY:
2132
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.102
AC:
4241
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0135
AC:
207
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000338
AC:
23
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0189
AC:
40
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
202
404
606
808
1010
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0225
Hom.:
20
Bravo
AF:
0.0348
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
18
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Benign
0.58
PhyloP100
1.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1042347; hg19: chr11-32409784; API