rs1044008
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000435.3(NOTCH3):c.6438G>A(p.Ala2146Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0388 in 1,539,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,331 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 111 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.040 ( 1220 hom. )
Consequence
NOTCH3
NM_000435.3 synonymous
NM_000435.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.73
Genes affected
NOTCH3 (HGNC:7883): (notch receptor 3) This gene encodes the third discovered human homologue of the Drosophilia melanogaster type I membrane protein notch. In Drosophilia, notch interaction with its cell-bound ligands (delta, serrate) establishes an intercellular signalling pathway that plays a key role in neural development. Homologues of the notch-ligands have also been identified in human, but precise interactions between these ligands and the human notch homologues remains to be determined. Mutations in NOTCH3 have been identified as the underlying cause of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 19-15161190-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-15161190-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 256151.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-15161190-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-15161190-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.73 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0311 (4732/152282) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.043 (2926/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0417. There are 111 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2366 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 4732 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0311 AC: 4733AN: 152164Hom.: 111 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4733
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0319 AC: 4332AN: 135802Hom.: 80 AF XY: 0.0308 AC XY: 2285AN XY: 74102
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4332
AN:
135802
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2285
AN XY:
74102
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0397 AC: 55073AN: 1387398Hom.: 1220 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.0391 AC XY: 26792AN XY: 684784
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
55073
AN:
1387398
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
26792
AN XY:
684784
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0311 AC: 4732AN: 152282Hom.: 111 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0318 AC XY: 2366AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4732
AN:
152282
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2366
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 04, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 17, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Cerebral arteriopathy, autosomal dominant, with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at