rs1047768

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.138T>C​(p.His46His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.575 in 1,613,696 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 273,288 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.58 ( 26664 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.57 ( 246624 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00400

Publications

142 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 13-102852167-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102852167-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129009.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.004 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.658 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkc.138T>C p.His46His synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 15 ENST00000652225.2 NP_000114.3 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkc.1500T>C p.His500His synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 23 NP_001191354.2 R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkc.138T>C p.His46His synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 15 NM_000123.4 ENSP00000498881.2 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639435.1 linkc.1500T>C p.His500His synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 25 5 ENSP00000491742.1 R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639132.1 linkc.813T>C p.His271His synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 24 5 ENSP00000492684.1 A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.583
AC:
88613
AN:
151876
Hom.:
26615
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.665
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.581
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.426
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.590
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.249
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.494
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.623
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.459
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.596
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.568
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.520
AC:
130641
AN:
251366
AF XY:
0.527
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.662
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.295
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.576
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.264
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.619
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.590
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.546
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.574
AC:
839091
AN:
1461702
Hom.:
246624
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
0.573
AC XY:
416387
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.668
AC:
22379
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.310
AC:
13851
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.577
AC:
15066
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.224
AC:
8872
AN:
39680
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.501
AC:
43205
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.613
AC:
32755
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.523
AC:
3017
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.599
AC:
665792
AN:
1111904
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.566
AC:
34154
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19212
38424
57637
76849
96061
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18010
36020
54030
72040
90050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.584
AC:
88713
AN:
151994
Hom.:
26664
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.580
AC XY:
43078
AN XY:
74280
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.665
AC:
27556
AN:
41442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.426
AC:
6506
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.590
AC:
2049
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.249
AC:
1289
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.495
AC:
2384
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.623
AC:
6552
AN:
10516
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.476
AC:
140
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.596
AC:
40504
AN:
67976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.571
AC:
1204
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1818
3636
5454
7272
9090
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
744
1488
2232
2976
3720
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.578
Hom.:
110292
Bravo
AF:
0.569
Asia WGS
AF:
0.406
AC:
1415
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.584
EpiControl
AF:
0.586

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:3
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Nov 10, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.10
DANN
Benign
0.33
PhyloP100
-0.0040
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1047768; hg19: chr13-103504517; COSMIC: COSV63245576; API