rs1047883
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001875.5(CPS1):āc.1030A>Gā(p.Thr344Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.567 in 1,610,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 260,102 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T344S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001875.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | NM_001875.5 | c.1030A>G | p.Thr344Ala | missense_variant | 10/38 | ENST00000233072.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPS1 | ENST00000233072.10 | c.1030A>G | p.Thr344Ala | missense_variant | 10/38 | 1 | NM_001875.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.581 AC: 87841AN: 151172Hom.: 25660 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.567 AC: 141566AN: 249584Hom.: 40570 AF XY: 0.573 AC XY: 77293AN XY: 134908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.565 AC: 824785AN: 1458762Hom.: 234408 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.568 AC XY: 412380AN XY: 725774
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.581 AC: 87924AN: 151288Hom.: 25694 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.583 AC XY: 43100AN XY: 73866
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 25, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Congenital hyperammonemia, type I Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 14, 2017 | Variant summary: The CPS1 c.1030A>G (p.Thr344Ala) variant located in the glutamine amidotransferase domain (via InterPro) involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 2/3 in silico tools (MutationTaster not working at time of scoring and SNPsandGo had a low reliability index, therefore, not captured here) predict a benign outcome. However, these for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 68398/120062 control chromosomes (19535 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.569689, which is approximately 360 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CPS1 variant (0.0015811), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Furthermore, the observed frequency indicates that the varant of interest is the major allele in the general population. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as "likely benign/benign." Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Pulmonary hypertension, neonatal, susceptibility to;C4082171:Congenital hyperammonemia, type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 12, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at