rs1048603
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001365479.2(USP40):c.3334C>T(p.Arg1112Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.325 in 1,609,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91,446 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1112H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001365479.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP40 | NM_001365479.2 | c.3334C>T | p.Arg1112Cys | missense_variant | Exon 29 of 32 | ENST00000678225.2 | NP_001352408.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP40 | ENST00000678225.2 | c.3334C>T | p.Arg1112Cys | missense_variant | Exon 29 of 32 | NM_001365479.2 | ENSP00000502952.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.416 AC: 63211AN: 151884Hom.: 15358 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.317 AC: 77059AN: 242714 AF XY: 0.317 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.316 AC: 459928AN: 1457622Hom.: 76070 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.315 AC XY: 228289AN XY: 724680 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.416 AC: 63271AN: 152002Hom.: 15376 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.413 AC XY: 30696AN XY: 74308 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at