rs104894187

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3

The NM_001012720.2(RGR):ā€‹c.196A>Cā€‹(p.Ser66Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RGR
NM_001012720.2 missense

Scores

3
7
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:2U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
RGR (HGNC:9990): (retinal G protein coupled receptor) This gene encodes a putative retinal G-protein coupled receptor. The gene is a member of the opsin subfamily of the 7 transmembrane, G-protein coupled receptor 1 family. Like other opsins which bind retinaldehyde, it contains a conserved lysine residue in the seventh transmembrane domain. The protein acts as a photoisomerase to catalyze the conversion of all-trans-retinal to 11-cis-retinal. The reverse isomerization occurs with rhodopsin in retinal photoreceptor cells. The protein is exclusively expressed in tissue adjacent to retinal photoreceptor cells, the retinal pigment epithelium and Mueller cells. This gene may be associated with autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (arRP and adRP, respectively). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.786

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RGRNM_001012720.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.196A>C p.Ser66Arg missense_variant 2/7 ENST00000652092.2
RGRNM_002921.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.196A>C p.Ser66Arg missense_variant 2/7
RGRNM_001012722.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.196A>C p.Ser66Arg missense_variant 2/6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RGRENST00000652092.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.196A>C p.Ser66Arg missense_variant 2/7 NM_001012720.2 A1P47804-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000318
AC:
8
AN:
251478
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000150
AC:
22
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000151
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000198
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000264
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa 44 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMDec 01, 1999- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 20, 2022This variant was identified as homozygous. Another variant (NM_033100.4:c.2522_2528del) was found in the same patient. Criteria applied: PS4_MOD, PM3, PM2_SUP, PP3 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaFeb 21, 2019This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PM2,PP3,PP5. -
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 18, 2020In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27623334, 10581022, 21067480, 30337596) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 25, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 17, 2023This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 66 of the RGR protein (p.Ser66Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs104894187, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with RGR-related conditions (PMID: 27623334, 30337596, 32531858, 34229535). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 9181). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cone dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaJan 01, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.98
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.059
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.040
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.056
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.47
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.40
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.79
D
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.51
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.0035
A;A;A
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.0
D
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Polyphen
0.99
D
Vest4
0.86
MutPred
0.12
Gain of glycosylation at Q49 (P = 0.1903);
MVP
0.76
ClinPred
0.88
D
GERP RS
3.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs104894187; hg19: chr10-86007463; COSMIC: COSV63894817; COSMIC: COSV63894817; API