rs104894187
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_001012720.2(RGR):āc.196A>Cā(p.Ser66Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000155 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001012720.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR | NM_001012720.2 | c.196A>C | p.Ser66Arg | missense_variant | 2/7 | ENST00000652092.2 | |
RGR | NM_002921.4 | c.196A>C | p.Ser66Arg | missense_variant | 2/7 | ||
RGR | NM_001012722.2 | c.196A>C | p.Ser66Arg | missense_variant | 2/6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGR | ENST00000652092.2 | c.196A>C | p.Ser66Arg | missense_variant | 2/7 | NM_001012720.2 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251478Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Retinitis pigmentosa 44 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Dec 01, 1999 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 20, 2022 | This variant was identified as homozygous. Another variant (NM_033100.4:c.2522_2528del) was found in the same patient. Criteria applied: PS4_MOD, PM3, PM2_SUP, PP3 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Feb 21, 2019 | This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PM2,PP3,PP5. - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 18, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27623334, 10581022, 21067480, 30337596) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 25, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 17, 2023 | This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 66 of the RGR protein (p.Ser66Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs104894187, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with RGR-related conditions (PMID: 27623334, 30337596, 32531858, 34229535). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 9181). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cone dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Jan 01, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at