rs104894364
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PP2PP3PM2PM1PS3PM6_Strong
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.173C>T (p.Thr58Ile) variant in KRAS has been reported in the literature as an unconfirmed de novo occurrence in a patient with clinical features of a RASopathy (PM6_Strong; PMID 23321623, 20112233, 16921267, 16474405, 22488832, 18247425, 20949621). This variant was absent from large population studies (PM2; ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that the p.Thr58Ile variant may impact protein function (PS3; PMID:23321623, 20949621, 16921267). Furthermore, the variant is in a location that has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel to be a mutational hotspot or domain of KRAS (PM1; PMID 29493581). The variant is located in the KRAS gene, which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel as a gene with a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common (PP2; PMID:29493581). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Thr58Ile variant may impact the protein (PP3). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for RASopathies in an autosomal dominant manner. Rasopathy-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied (PMID:29493581): PM6_Strong, PS3, PM2, PM1, PP2, PP3. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA256480/MONDO:0018997/004
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004985.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
- cardiofaciocutaneous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- linear nevus sebaceous syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Costello syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome with multiple lentiginesInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- Noonan syndrome-like disorder with loose anagen hairInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004985.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRAS | MANE Plus Clinical | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 6 | NP_203524.1 | P01116-1 | ||
| KRAS | MANE Select | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | NP_004976.2 | |||
| KRAS | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 6 | NP_001356715.1 | P01116-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRAS | TSL:1 MANE Plus Clinical | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000256078.5 | P01116-1 | ||
| KRAS | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000308495.3 | P01116-2 | ||
| KRAS | c.173C>T | p.Thr58Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000508921.1 | P01116-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461754Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727188 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at