rs104894510
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_000101.4(CYBA):c.281A>G(p.His94Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000101.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461464Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727076
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Granulomatous disease, chronic, autosomal recessive, cytochrome b-negative Pathogenic:1
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: CYBA c.281A>G (p.His94Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250956 control chromosomes. c.281A>G has been reported in the literature in a homozygous individual affected with Chronic Granulomatous Disease (De Boer_1992). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function and showed lack of protein production in fibroblasts derived from the patient; however, the data does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (De Boer_1992). The following publication have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 1415254). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 2261). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at