rs104894637
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM5PP5
The NM_000199.5(SGSH):c.197C>T(p.Ser66Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000759 in 1,448,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S66W) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000199.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mucopolysaccharidosis type 3AInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000199.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGSH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.197C>T | p.Ser66Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 8 | ENSP00000314606.6 | P51688 | ||
| SGSH | TSL:1 | n.206C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 5 | |||||
| SGSH | TSL:4 | c.-65C>T | 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000461128.1 | I3L4B7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000442 AC: 1AN: 226198 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000759 AC: 11AN: 1448528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000417 AC XY: 3AN XY: 719644 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at