rs104894816
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_002049.4(GATA1):c.653A>G(p.Asp218Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D218N) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002049.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA1 | NM_002049.4 | c.653A>G | p.Asp218Gly | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000376670.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA1 | ENST00000376670.9 | c.653A>G | p.Asp218Gly | missense_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_002049.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 22
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 22
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Thrombocytopenia, X-linked, with or without dyserythropoietic anemia Pathogenic:1Other:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ISTH-SSC Genomics in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, KU Leuven, Center for Molecular and Vascular Biology | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Thrombocytopenia, X-linked, without dyserythropoietic anemia Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 01, 2001 | - - |
Thrombocytopenia Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge | Feb 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at