rs104895452

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001370466.1(NOD2):c.2672C>A(p.Ala891Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000445 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A891S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00053 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00044 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NOD2
NM_001370466.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.55

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOD2 (HGNC:5331): (nucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2) This gene is a member of the Nod1/Apaf-1 family and encodes a protein with two caspase recruitment (CARD) domains and six leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). The protein is primarily expressed in the peripheral blood leukocytes. It plays a role in the immune response to intracellular bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) by recognizing the muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derived from them and activating the NFKB protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Crohn disease and Blau syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

NOD2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.048981726).

BP6

Variant 16-50722660-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-50722660-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 97866.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1, Likely_benign=5}. Variant chr16-50722660-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000525 (80/152326) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00216 (33/15300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00158. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 41 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOD2	NM_001370466.1 link	c.2672C>A	p.Ala891Asp	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 12	ENST00000647318.2	NP_001357395.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOD2	ENST00000647318.2 link	c.2672C>A	p.Ala891Asp	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 12		NM_001370466.1	ENSP00000495993.1		Q9HC29-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000526

AC:

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00383

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000577

AC:

145

AN:

251472

AF XY:

0.000508

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000466

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00195

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000436

AC:

638

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000403

AC XY:

293

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33480

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

AC:

AN:

44724

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00348

AC:

AN:

26136

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000343

AC:

381

AN:

1111996

Gnomad4 Remaining exome

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

60396

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

144

180

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000525

AC:

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000550

AC XY:

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

AC:

0.000168374

AN:

0.000168374

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00216

AC:

0.00215686

AN:

0.00215686

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00202

AC:

0.00201729

AN:

0.00201729

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000323

AC:

0.000323453

AN:

0.000323453

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00379

AC:

0.00378788

AN:

0.00378788

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000558

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000865

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000814

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000395

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Nov 08, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 30, 2022

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1 -

Blau syndrome

Benign:1Other:1

Unité médicale des maladies autoinflammatoires, CHRU Montpellier

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:literature only

- -

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Regional enteritis;C5201146:Blau syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 16, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autoinflammatory syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 11, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inflammatory bowel disease 1

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

NOD2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 12, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.32

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.033

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.14

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.23

.;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.79

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.88

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.037

MetaRNN

Benign

0.049

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.42

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

.;M

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.9

.;D

REVEL

Benign

0.27

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0040

.;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D

Vest4

0.84

MVP

0.89

MPC

0.61

ClinPred

0.089

GERP RS

5.9

Varity_R

0.69

gMVP

0.75

Mutation Taster

=70/30

polymorphism

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over