Menu
GeneBe

rs10496192

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.6212T>C(p.Ile2071Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.158 in 1,613,212 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,161 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2071V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1600 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.16 ( 19561 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.124
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=9.441972E-4).
BP6
Variant 2-73452739-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73452739-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 383769.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.176 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.6212T>C p.Ile2071Thr missense_variant 8/23 ENST00000613296.6
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6215T>C p.Ile2072Thr missense_variant 8/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.6212T>C p.Ile2071Thr missense_variant 8/231 NM_001378454.1 P3Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.138
AC:
20924
AN:
152070
Hom.:
1599
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0811
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.253
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.181
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.149
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.129
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.132
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.171
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.156
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.145
AC:
35804
AN:
246918
Hom.:
2864
AF XY:
0.147
AC XY:
19725
AN XY:
134302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0795
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.142
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00413
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.170
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.161
AC:
234698
AN:
1461024
Hom.:
19561
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.161
AC XY:
117148
AN XY:
726836
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0794
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00403
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.171
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.138
AC:
20938
AN:
152188
Hom.:
1600
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.135
AC XY:
10074
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0810
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.182
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.149
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00405
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.130
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.171
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.154
Alfa
AF:
0.159
Hom.:
3484
Bravo
AF:
0.140
TwinsUK
AF:
0.164
AC:
609
ALSPAC
AF:
0.168
AC:
649
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0804
AC:
292
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.167
AC:
1356
ExAC
AF:
0.142
AC:
17109
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0630
AC:
219
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.174
EpiControl
AF:
0.177

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 21, 2016p.Ile2070Thr in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 16.61% (10786/64944) of European c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs10496192). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 23, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 21, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
Cadd
Benign
1.4
Dann
Benign
0.56
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.023
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.042
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.53
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.00094
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T
Vest4
0.048
ClinPred
0.0012
T
GERP RS
-5.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.032
gMVP
0.018

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10496192; hg19: chr2-73679866; API