rs1050239
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000543.5(SMPD1):c.1522G>A(p.Gly508Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.219 in 1,613,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40,019 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 2946 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.22 ( 37073 hom. )
Consequence
SMPD1
NM_000543.5 missense
NM_000543.5 missense
Scores
5
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.33
Genes affected
SMPD1 (HGNC:11120): (sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase that converts sphingomyelin to ceramide. The encoded protein also has phospholipase C activity. Defects in this gene are a cause of Niemann-Pick disease type A (NPA) and Niemann-Pick disease type B (NPB). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0019872487).
BP6
Variant 11-6394233-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-6394233-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93317.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-6394233-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.23 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPD1 | NM_000543.5 | c.1522G>A | p.Gly508Arg | missense_variant | 6/6 | ENST00000342245.9 | NP_000534.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPD1 | ENST00000342245.9 | c.1522G>A | p.Gly508Arg | missense_variant | 6/6 | 1 | NM_000543.5 | ENSP00000340409 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.192 AC: 29236AN: 151956Hom.: 2942 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
29236
AN:
151956
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.191 AC: 48098AN: 251326Hom.: 4926 AF XY: 0.190 AC XY: 25790AN XY: 135832
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
48098
AN:
251326
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25790
AN XY:
135832
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.221 AC: 323546AN: 1461780Hom.: 37073 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.219 AC XY: 158913AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
323546
AN:
1461780
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
158913
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.192 AC: 29255AN: 152074Hom.: 2946 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.189 AC XY: 14052AN XY: 74342
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
29255
AN:
152074
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
14052
AN XY:
74342
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
901
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
930
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
604
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1970
ExAC
AF:
AC:
23270
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 27, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24977483) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 05, 2016 | Variant Summary: The c.1522G>A in SMPD1 gene is a missense change that involves the alteration of a mildly conserved nucleotide and 3/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.19 (23261/121314 chrs tested). This frequency exceeds the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in this gene (0.002). A reputable database/diagnostic center has classified the variant of interest as Benign. Taking together, based on the prevalence in general population, the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Niemann-Pick disease, type A Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 06, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Niemann-Pick disease, type B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Niemann-Pick disease, type A;C0268243:Niemann-Pick disease, type B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at