Menu
GeneBe

rs1051321465

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_006265.3(RAD21):c.1349G>A(p.Arg450His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000684 in 1,608,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD21
NM_006265.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.82
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD21 (HGNC:9811): (RAD21 cohesin complex component) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to the gene product of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad21, a gene involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, as well as in chromatid cohesion during mitosis. This protein is a nuclear phospho-protein, which becomes hyperphosphorylated in cell cycle M phase. The highly regulated association of this protein with mitotic chromatin specifically at the centromere region suggests its role in sister chromatid cohesion in mitotic cells. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, RAD21
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.095844).
BP6
Variant 8-116852069-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-116852069-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 430294.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00000618 (9/1456450) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000202 (9/44610). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 3 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD21NM_006265.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1349G>A p.Arg450His missense_variant 11/14 ENST00000297338.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD21ENST00000297338.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1349G>A p.Arg450His missense_variant 11/141 NM_006265.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152110
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000319
AC:
8
AN:
250764
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000148
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135556
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000232
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000618
AC:
9
AN:
1456450
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000414
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
723772
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152110
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74286
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing;provider interpretationGeisinger Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health SystemMay 26, 2017This 9 year old female with an intellectual disability was found to carry a missense variant in the RAD21 gene. Inheritance is unknown, as is paternal family history. She is non-dysmorphic, normocephalic, and does not have any congenital anomalies. While variable expressivity has been noted in some individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 4, this patient's lack of growth retardation, skeletal anomalies, and facial dysmorphism make it more unlikely that this is a causative variant for her intellectual disability. The variant is absent from population databases and has not been reported in any individuals with Cornelia de Lange syndrome, to our knowledge. Computational prediction models are inconsistent. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 05, 2023- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 13, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 06, 2018In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.085
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.063
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0077
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.096
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.28
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.48
N
REVEL
Benign
0.044
Sift
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.19
MutPred
0.23
Loss of helix (P = 0.0093);
MVP
0.39
MPC
0.45
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.27

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1051321465; hg19: chr8-117864308; COSMIC: COSV52061152; COSMIC: COSV52061152; API