rs1052371
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000208.4(INSR):c.*4474C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.23 in 152,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,655 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 4654 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.38 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
INSR
NM_000208.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_000208.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.616
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 19-7112582-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7112582-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 330348.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.406 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | NM_000208.4 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | ENST00000302850.10 | ||
INSR | NM_001079817.3 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 | |||
INSR | XM_011527988.3 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | |||
INSR | XM_011527989.4 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | ENST00000302850.10 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 22/22 | 1 | NM_000208.4 | A2 | ||
INSR | ENST00000341500.9 | c.*4474C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 21/21 | 1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.230 AC: 34914AN: 151926Hom.: 4634 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
34914
AN:
151926
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.375 AC: 3AN: 8Hom.: 1 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.167 AC XY: 1AN XY: 6
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
8
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
6
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.230 AC: 34967AN: 152044Hom.: 4654 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.232 AC XY: 17254AN XY: 74320
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
34967
AN:
152044
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
17254
AN XY:
74320
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1165
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at