rs1052553
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001377265.1(MAPT):āc.1857A>Gā(p.Ala619=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.191 in 1,600,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32,929 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.15 ( 2153 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.20 ( 30776 hom. )
Consequence
MAPT
NM_001377265.1 synonymous
NM_001377265.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.43
Genes affected
MAPT (HGNC:6893): (microtubule associated protein tau) This gene encodes the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) whose transcript undergoes complex, regulated alternative splicing, giving rise to several mRNA species. MAPT transcripts are differentially expressed in the nervous system, depending on stage of neuronal maturation and neuron type. MAPT gene mutations have been associated with several neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, frontotemporal dementia, cortico-basal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 17-45996523-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-45996523-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 98207.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-45996523-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.43 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.215 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPT | NM_001377265.1 | c.1857A>G | p.Ala619= | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000262410.10 | NP_001364194.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPT | ENST00000262410.10 | c.1857A>G | p.Ala619= | synonymous_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_001377265.1 | ENSP00000262410 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.147 AC: 22120AN: 150680Hom.: 2155 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
22120
AN:
150680
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.145 AC: 35916AN: 248312Hom.: 3452 AF XY: 0.148 AC XY: 19960AN XY: 134616
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
35916
AN:
248312
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
19960
AN XY:
134616
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.196 AC: 283520AN: 1449850Hom.: 30776 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.193 AC XY: 139237AN XY: 721366
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
283520
AN:
1449850
Hom.:
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
AC XY:
139237
AN XY:
721366
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.147 AC: 22110AN: 150808Hom.: 2153 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.138 AC XY: 10132AN XY: 73648
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
22110
AN:
150808
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
10132
AN XY:
73648
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
112
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 25, 2011 | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 11, 2018 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | VIB Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Antwerp | - | - - |
MAPT-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Frontotemporal dementia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at