rs1053667
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBA1
The NM_001308120.2(TOGARAM1):c.*274T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.093 in 295,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,944 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1386 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.073 ( 558 hom. )
Consequence
TOGARAM1
NM_001308120.2 3_prime_UTR
NM_001308120.2 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.81
Genes affected
TOGARAM1 (HGNC:19959): (TOG array regulator of axonemal microtubules 1) Predicted to enable microtubule binding activity. Predicted to be involved in organelle assembly and positive regulation of microtubule polymerization. Predicted to be located in ciliary basal body. Predicted to be active in cilium and microtubule cytoskeleton. Predicted to colocalize with microtubule. Implicated in Joubert syndrome. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.226 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOGARAM1 | NM_001308120.2 | c.*274T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 20 of 20 | ENST00000361462.7 | NP_001295049.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.112 AC: 16992AN: 152114Hom.: 1375 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
16992
AN:
152114
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0728 AC: 10427AN: 143312Hom.: 558 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.0714 AC XY: 5306AN XY: 74286 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
10427
AN:
143312
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
5306
AN XY:
74286
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
AC:
1020
AN:
4602
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
AC:
401
AN:
5722
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
AC:
483
AN:
5204
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
AC:
1576
AN:
10648
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
AC:
842
AN:
9230
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
AC:
628
AN:
7074
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
AC:
4788
AN:
91030
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
AC:
648
AN:
9146
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
452
904
1356
1808
2260
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
62
124
186
248
310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.112 AC: 17044AN: 152232Hom.: 1386 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.112 AC XY: 8349AN XY: 74440 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
17044
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8349
AN XY:
74440
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
AC:
0.229469
AN:
0.229469
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
AC:
0.0757259
AN:
0.0757259
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
AC:
0.0874207
AN:
0.0874207
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
AC:
0.120177
AN:
0.120177
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
AC:
0.100705
AN:
0.100705
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
AC:
0.0808157
AN:
0.0808157
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
AC:
0.0550933
AN:
0.0550933
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
AC:
0.104541
AN:
0.104541
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
732
1464
2196
2928
3660
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
182
364
546
728
910
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
383
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at