rs1054480
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_014244.5(ADAMTS2):c.3529C>T(p.Pro1177Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.291 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71,235 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1177L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014244.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | NM_014244.5 | c.3529C>T | p.Pro1177Ser | missense_variant | 22/22 | ENST00000251582.12 | |
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417895.1 | c.3034C>T | p.Pro1012Ser | missense_variant | 21/21 | ||
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417896.1 | c.2647C>T | p.Pro883Ser | missense_variant | 20/20 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000251582.12 | c.3529C>T | p.Pro1177Ser | missense_variant | 22/22 | 1 | NM_014244.5 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.245 AC: 37273AN: 151918Hom.: 5425 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.308 AC: 77472AN: 251482Hom.: 12671 AF XY: 0.312 AC XY: 42391AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.295 AC: 431642AN: 1461880Hom.: 65809 Cov.: 43 AF XY: 0.298 AC XY: 217028AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.245 AC: 37282AN: 152036Hom.: 5426 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.248 AC XY: 18432AN XY: 74292
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Feb 04, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 07, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at