rs1054889
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000379.4(XDH):c.*1516C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.409 in 152,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,475 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000379.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- xanthinuria type IInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.409 AC: 62162AN: 151934Hom.: 14478 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.333 AC: 2AN: 6Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 2 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.409 AC: 62173AN: 152052Hom.: 14475 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.418 AC XY: 31094AN XY: 74314 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
- -
Hereditary xanthinuria type 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at