rs1057297

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.177G>T​(p.Arg59=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.017 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 650 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.038 ( 238 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 412 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.928
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.24).
BP6
Variant 17-50199874-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50199874-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 254945.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50199874-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-50199874-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.928 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.104 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.177G>T p.Arg59= synonymous_variant 2/51 ENST00000225964.10
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.177G>T p.Arg59= synonymous_variant 2/48
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.177G>T p.Arg59= synonymous_variant 2/49
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.177G>T p.Arg59= synonymous_variant 2/38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.177G>T p.Arg59= synonymous_variant 2/511 NM_000088.4 P1
COL1A1ENST00000507689.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.231G>T p.Arg77= synonymous_variant 1/42
COL1A1ENST00000474644.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.296G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/43
ENST00000509943.2 linkuse as main transcript upstream_gene_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0383
AC:
5830
AN:
152160
Hom.:
238
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0206
AC:
5168
AN:
251368
Hom.:
130
AF XY:
0.0201
AC XY:
2726
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0388
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0116
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0148
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0148
AC:
21605
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
412
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0154
AC XY:
11198
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0391
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0196
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0384
AC:
5841
AN:
152278
Hom.:
238
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0374
AC XY:
2785
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0284
Alfa
AF:
0.0172
Hom.:
88
Bravo
AF:
0.0405
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0250
AC:
85
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0111
EpiControl
AF:
0.0108

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 16, 2022- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 07, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 07, 2022- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 08, 2017- -
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 17, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.94

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1057297; hg19: chr17-48277235; COSMIC: COSV56806402; COSMIC: COSV56806402; API