rs1057517601
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2
The NM_058195.4(CDKN2A):c.62G>A(p.Arg21Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,452,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CDKN2A
NM_058195.4 missense
NM_058195.4 missense
Scores
6
5
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.76
Genes affected
CDKN2A (HGNC:1787): (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) This gene generates several transcript variants which differ in their first exons. At least three alternatively spliced variants encoding distinct proteins have been reported, two of which encode structurally related isoforms known to function as inhibitors of CDK4 kinase. The remaining transcript includes an alternate first exon located 20 Kb upstream of the remainder of the gene; this transcript contains an alternate open reading frame (ARF) that specifies a protein which is structurally unrelated to the products of the other variants. This ARF product functions as a stabilizer of the tumor suppressor protein p53 as it can interact with, and sequester, the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2, a protein responsible for the degradation of p53. In spite of the structural and functional differences, the CDK inhibitor isoforms and the ARF product encoded by this gene, through the regulatory roles of CDK4 and p53 in cell cycle G1 progression, share a common functionality in cell cycle G1 control. This gene is frequently mutated or deleted in a wide variety of tumors, and is known to be an important tumor suppressor gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.769
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | c.62G>A | p.Arg21Lys | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000579755.2 | NP_478102.2 | |
CDKN2A | NM_001363763.2 | c.-4+551G>A | intron_variant | NP_001350692.1 | ||||
CDKN2A | XM_047422597.1 | c.-4+277G>A | intron_variant | XP_047278553.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | c.62G>A | p.Arg21Lys | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_058195.4 | ENSP00000462950.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000850 AC: 2AN: 235252Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000770 AC XY: 1AN XY: 129902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
235252
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
129902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000620 AC: 9AN: 1452610Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000831 AC XY: 6AN XY: 721986
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
1452610
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
721986
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
31
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 21, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 20, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 23, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 01, 2024 | The p.R21K variant (also known as c.62G>A), located in coding exon 1 of the CDKN2A (p14ARF) gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 62. The arginine at codon 21 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. In a study of Danish high-risk melanoma cases, this variant was reported in an individual diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma at age 54 with no reported family history of cutaneous melanoma (Wadt KA et al. PLoS ONE. 2015 Mar;10:e0122662). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. - |
Familial melanoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 07, 2021 | This sequence change replaces arginine with lysine at codon 21 of the CDKN2A (p14ARF) protein (p.Arg21Lys). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between arginine and lysine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with cutaneous melanoma (PMID: 25803691, 28830827). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 371974). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
.;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
.;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at