rs1057854
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000085.5(CLCNKB):c.*271G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000085.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Bartter disease type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Bartter disease type 4BInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- Bartter syndrome type 4Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Gitelman syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.329 AC: 46820AN: 142470Hom.: 223 Cov.: 41 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.298 AC: 41736AN: 140152 AF XY: 0.301 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR;InbreedingCoeff AF: 0.275 AC: 126136AN: 458492Hom.: 114 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.277 AC XY: 69246AN XY: 250084 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: InbreedingCoeff AF: 0.329 AC: 46847AN: 142580Hom.: 224 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.326 AC XY: 22729AN XY: 69680 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC frequency -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at