rs1060218
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000159.4(GCDH):c.1173G>T(p.Gly391=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.351 in 1,612,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 103,534 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.31 ( 7709 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 95825 hom. )
Consequence
GCDH
NM_000159.4 synonymous
NM_000159.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.11
Genes affected
GCDH (HGNC:4189): (glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family. It catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and CO(2) in the degradative pathway of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine, and L-tryptophan metabolism. It uses electron transfer flavoprotein as its electron acceptor. The enzyme exists in the mitochondrial matrix as a homotetramer of 45-kD subunits. Mutations in this gene result in the metabolic disorder glutaric aciduria type 1, which is also known as glutaric acidemia type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 12. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 19-12897793-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12897793-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92529.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-12897793-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.11 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.383 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | NM_000159.4 | c.1173G>T | p.Gly391= | synonymous_variant | 11/12 | ENST00000222214.10 | |
GCDH | NM_013976.5 | c.1173G>T | p.Gly391= | synonymous_variant | 11/12 | ||
GCDH | NR_102316.1 | n.1336G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 11/12 | |||
GCDH | NR_102317.1 | n.1554G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | ENST00000222214.10 | c.1173G>T | p.Gly391= | synonymous_variant | 11/12 | 1 | NM_000159.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.307 AC: 46581AN: 151716Hom.: 7691 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
46581
AN:
151716
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.330 AC: 83034AN: 251404Hom.: 14792 AF XY: 0.328 AC XY: 44535AN XY: 135900
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
83034
AN:
251404
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
44535
AN XY:
135900
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.355 AC: 519119AN: 1461078Hom.: 95825 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.352 AC XY: 255790AN XY: 726844
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
519119
AN:
1461078
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
255790
AN XY:
726844
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.307 AC: 46632AN: 151834Hom.: 7709 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.303 AC XY: 22507AN XY: 74198
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
46632
AN:
151834
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
22507
AN XY:
74198
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
870
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Glutaric aciduria, type 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 19, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 13, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 16, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Elevated circulating glutaric acid concentration Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at