rs1060500125
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 6P and 1B. PM1PM2PP2PP3BP6
The ENST00000371953.8(PTEN):āc.779A>Gā(p.Lys260Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K260K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000371953.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEN | NM_000314.8 | c.779A>G | p.Lys260Arg | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000371953.8 | NP_000305.3 | |
PTEN | NM_001304717.5 | c.1298A>G | p.Lys433Arg | missense_variant | 8/10 | NP_001291646.4 | ||
PTEN | NM_001304718.2 | c.188A>G | p.Lys63Arg | missense_variant | 7/9 | NP_001291647.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEN | ENST00000371953.8 | c.779A>G | p.Lys260Arg | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_000314.8 | ENSP00000361021 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251420Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461798Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 04, 2020 | This missense variant replaces lysine with arginine at codon 260 of the PTEN protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/251420 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 12, 2024 | Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).For PTEN, two assays measuring activity and abundance were used. If the abundance was categorized as "wt-like" or "possibly wt-like," BS3_Supporting evidence was used. Furthermore, if the cumulative score was greater than -5, BS3_moderate evidence was used. This variant GRCh37:10:89717754:A>G was assigned evidence codes ['BS3_Supporting', 'BS1_Supporting'] and an overall classification of Likely Benign - |
PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 08, 2022 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 404167). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with glycogenic acanthosis (PMID: 16773562). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 260 of the PTEN protein (p.Lys260Arg). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at