rs1060501514
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):āc.1243T>Cā(p.Ser415Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S415S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006206.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | NM_006206.6 | c.1243T>C | p.Ser415Pro | missense_variant | 9/23 | ENST00000257290.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGFRA | ENST00000257290.10 | c.1243T>C | p.Ser415Pro | missense_variant | 9/23 | 1 | NM_006206.6 | P1 | |
PDGFRA | ENST00000509092.5 | n.1061T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/15 | 1 | ||||
PDGFRA | ENST00000509490.5 | c.1243T>C | p.Ser415Pro | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 9/18 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251334Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461854Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 07, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 19, 2023 | This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PDGFRA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 407426). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt PDGFRA protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 415 of the PDGFRA protein (p.Ser415Pro). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 13, 2022 | The p.S415P variant (also known as c.1243T>C), located in coding exon 8 of the PDGFRA gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1243. The serine at codon 415 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at