rs1060502832
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001256715.2(DNAAF3):c.485G>T(p.Arg162Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000078 in 1,282,656 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001256715.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.80e-7 AC: 1AN: 1282656Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000160 AC XY: 1AN XY: 623062
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces arginine with leucine at codon 230 of the DNAAF3 protein (p.Arg230Leu). The arginine residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between arginine and leucine. While this variant is not present in population databases, the frequency information is unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the ExAC database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in an individual with a DNAAF3-related disease. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. In summary, this variant is a novel missense change that is not predicted to affect protein function. There is no indication that it causes disease, but the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at