rs1060503281
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_000038.6(APC):āc.8071A>Gā(p.Asn2691Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000149 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N2691I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- desmoid tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- familial adenomatous polyposis 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomachInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Turcot syndrome with polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000038.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | NM_000038.6 | MANE Select | c.8071A>G | p.Asn2691Asp | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_000029.2 | ||
| APC | NM_001407446.1 | c.8155A>G | p.Asn2719Asp | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_001394375.1 | |||
| APC | NM_001354896.2 | c.8125A>G | p.Asn2709Asp | missense | Exon 17 of 17 | NP_001341825.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | ENST00000257430.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.8071A>G | p.Asn2691Asp | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
| APC | ENST00000508376.6 | TSL:1 | c.8071A>G | p.Asn2691Asp | missense | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000427089.2 | ||
| ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | TSL:3 | n.229-12984A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251320 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1461746Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 727186 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:4
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.
This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 2691 of the APC protein (p.Asn2691Asp). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with APC-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 411383). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt APC protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk.
not provided Uncertain:4
Variant summary: The APC c.8071A>G (p.Asn2691Asp) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant is absent in 121334 control chromosomes. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) until additional information becomes available.
The APC c.8071A>G (p.Asn2691Asp) variant has not been reported in individuals with APC-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/113620 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18199528)
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
The p.N2691D variant (also known as c.8071A>G), located in coding exon 15 of the APC gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 8071. The asparagine at codon 2691 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, in silico predictors for this gene do not accurately predict pathogenicity. Missense alterations in APC are not a common cause of disease (Spier I et al. Genet Med. 2024 Feb;26(2):100992). Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Uncertain:1
This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 2691 of the APC protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with APC-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 4/251320 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at