rs1064793339
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3
The ENST00000404276.6(CHEK2):āc.1084T>Cā(p.Cys362Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000187 in 1,608,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C362Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000404276.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1084T>C | p.Cys362Arg | missense_variant | 10/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1084T>C | p.Cys362Arg | missense_variant | 10/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251266Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1456184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 724832
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Oct 17, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 14, 2023 | This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CHEK2-related conditions. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 418646). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.002%). This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 362 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Cys362Arg). - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 07, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22419737, 19782031) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 12, 2022 | The p.C362R variant (also known as c.1084T>C), located in coding exon 9 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1084. The cysteine at codon 362 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at