rs1071646

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001018005.2(TPM1):​c.453C>A​(p.Ala151Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.664 in 1,610,730 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 357,799 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 32801 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.66 ( 324998 hom. )

Consequence

TPM1
NM_001018005.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.42

Publications

41 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TPM1 (HGNC:12010): (tropomyosin 1) This gene is a member of the tropomyosin family of highly conserved, widely distributed actin-binding proteins involved in the contractile system of striated and smooth muscles and the cytoskeleton of non-muscle cells. Tropomyosin is composed of two alpha-helical chains arranged as a coiled-coil. It is polymerized end to end along the two grooves of actin filaments and provides stability to the filaments. The encoded protein is one type of alpha helical chain that forms the predominant tropomyosin of striated muscle, where it also functions in association with the troponin complex to regulate the calcium-dependent interaction of actin and myosin during muscle contraction. In smooth muscle and non-muscle cells, alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding a range of isoforms have been described. Mutations in this gene are associated with type 3 familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
TPM1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, G2P
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • left ventricular noncompaction
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).
BP6
Variant 15-63059641-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-63059641-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 31888.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.41 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.927 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TPM1NM_001018005.2 linkc.453C>A p.Ala151Ala synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000403994.9 NP_001018005.1 P09493-1D9YZV4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TPM1ENST00000403994.9 linkc.453C>A p.Ala151Ala synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 1 NM_001018005.2 ENSP00000385107.4 P09493-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.652
AC:
99022
AN:
151884
Hom.:
32785
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.613
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.741
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.577
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.653
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.949
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.724
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.698
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.608
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.657
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.636
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.670
AC:
168498
AN:
251338
AF XY:
0.674
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.614
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.555
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.660
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.958
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.703
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.652
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.674
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.665
AC:
969963
AN:
1458728
Hom.:
324998
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.666
AC XY:
483250
AN XY:
725788
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.616
AC:
20548
AN:
33376
American (AMR)
AF:
0.563
AC:
25111
AN:
44632
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.665
AC:
17308
AN:
26038
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.952
AC:
37679
AN:
39584
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.702
AC:
60507
AN:
86132
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.698
AC:
37086
AN:
53108
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.596
AC:
3434
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.656
AC:
727733
AN:
1109902
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.674
AC:
40557
AN:
60194
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16642
33284
49925
66567
83209
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19130
38260
57390
76520
95650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.652
AC:
99072
AN:
152002
Hom.:
32801
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.656
AC XY:
48748
AN XY:
74284
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.613
AC:
25365
AN:
41410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.577
AC:
8803
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.653
AC:
2267
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.950
AC:
4917
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.724
AC:
3492
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.698
AC:
7371
AN:
10556
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.612
AC:
180
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.657
AC:
44653
AN:
67978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.639
AC:
1348
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1739
3478
5218
6957
8696
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
800
1600
2400
3200
4000
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.657
Hom.:
150650
Bravo
AF:
0.646
Asia WGS
AF:
0.818
AC:
2845
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.645
EpiControl
AF:
0.644

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Jan 18, 2008
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 10, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TPM1 c.453C>A alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.67 in 251338 control chromosomes, suggesting that it is the major allele and therefore benign. The observed variant frequency is approximately 9000 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TPM1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (7.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and all laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Sep 25, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3 Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 27, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Oct 02, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1Other:1
Apr 15, 2012
Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (TPM1)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 11, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

TPM1-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 07, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Benign:1
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.95
PhyloP100
3.4
Mutation Taster
=88/12
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1071646; hg19: chr15-63351840; COSMIC: COSV51261240; COSMIC: COSV51261240; API